This will not be the first bail out and it won’t be the last. But it is, far and away, the most expensive so far. I can see why the administration would like to see a clean and complete bill. Even congress realizes that this bill will be studied and anything in the way of earmarks or pet projects will be examined by the voters. That’s why they want to divide it up and only offer smaller amounts of money. They assume that the next payment will not be as closely watched and they will be able to ‘lard it up’. The markets at home ad abroad need to know that all the money is in place and available and can not be tampered with in the future by congress.
The $700B will not be spent or used as soon as the bill is signed. If like other bailouts, smaller amounts are spent as needed. Take a look at the Resolution Trust Company (RTC) of the savings and loan bail out. They took over failing savings and loans, sold their assets and helped other savings and loans on the edge. This was all done in the private markets and purchases and sales had to meet the ‘market test’. In the end RTC made money. The Chrysler bail out gave money to the corporation, expected repayment and the government loan required stock options that it could purchase of the corporation.
No one knows how much money is need for the Freddie / Fannie bail out. But it should use a combination of the above methods. A number of us for years had hoped it would be totally privatized. It should be packaged in smaller units and sold (or given away if needed). Stock purchases should travel with the individual package and the public should have the opportunity to invest. (Another reason that $700B needs to be committed and accessible.)
But privatization did not happen. Instead it got larger and more governmentally run. And now congress thinks that we should allow them even more control even though management has been top heavy and horrid. You would think that after the 2006 disaster they would have realized that a mortgage company is not a great place to make social policy and that too many rules, if not enforced, leads to nepotism, bad judgement and corruption.